Skip to content

Multi-Phase Plan to Increase AI Effectiveness

Section titled “Multi-Phase Plan to Increase AI Effectiveness”

Synthesized from: CC /insights report (3,336 messages, 439 sessions), Optimizing AI Benefits strategy, Dynalist AI notes (1,233 lines of captured ideas), and current KB review. Focused on Claude Code as primary tool, with SMART DEBT Mission alignment.


You are already a power user — 439 sessions, 276 commits, 11,444 Bash calls in one month. But the CC /insights report reveals a consistent pattern: Claude gets you 80-90% of the way but rarely nails the last mile. The three root causes are: (1) no persistent CLAUDE.md guardrails, (2) no verification-before-done protocol, and (3) underuse of skills, hooks, and automation features.

This plan addresses those gaps in four phases: Environment (WSL vs Windows clarity), Foundation (eliminate friction), Amplify (compound capabilities via skills and workflow), and Accelerate (autonomous pipelines and scaling).


Phase 1: Environment — WSL vs Windows (Priority: Decide First)

Section titled “Phase 1: Environment — WSL vs Windows (Priority: Decide First)”

Running CC from the right environment eliminates an entire class of friction. Your files live on Windows (D:\), your AI config SSoT lives in WSL (~/config-ai/), and Obsidian watches Windows paths. Choosing wrong means path translation headaches, cross-filesystem I/O penalties, and split configuration.

Your taskLaunch CC fromWhy
KB work (this repo)WindowsFiles on D:\. Obsidian watches Windows paths. No build tools needed — just Read/Write/Edit/Grep. Zero benefit from WSL.
Monorepo devWSL (if code moves to WSL filesystem) or Windows (if code stays on D:\)Dev tooling (npm, pnpm, astro, vite, playwright) runs better on native Linux. BUT accessing D:\ from WSL via /mnt/d/ adds I/O overhead and makes git slower. Only worth it if you move the repo into WSL filesystem.
Python utilitiesWSLPython ecosystem is Linux-native. Scripts likely already in ~/.
Quick research / writingEitherNo filesystem dependency.
  • Cross-filesystem penalty: Accessing /mnt/d/ from WSL is significantly slower than native Windows access to D:\ — especially for git operations and file-heavy tasks like your KB (2,431 Markdown file operations in one month per /insights).
  • Path mismatch: WSL CC uses /mnt/d/FSS/KB/Business/... but Obsidian sees D:\FSS\KB\Business\.... Slash commands, CLAUDE.md references, and file paths in notes all need translation.
  • Obsidian won’t see WSL changes instantly: File watchers across the WSL/Windows boundary are unreliable. Edits made via WSL CC to /mnt/d/ files may have delayed visibility in Obsidian.
  • No dev tooling needed for KB: Your KB work is markdown files — Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep. These work identically on both platforms. WSL adds complexity for zero benefit.

Why WSL For Dev Work (When Code Is On WSL Filesystem)

Section titled “Why WSL For Dev Work (When Code Is On WSL Filesystem)”
  • Native bash, better tool compatibility
  • npm/pnpm/node run faster on native Linux filesystem
  • Your AI config SSoT (~/config-ai/) is there
  • Playwright, astro, vite — all Linux-first
  • Better sandboxing support

For now: stay on Windows for KB work. This is correct.

Consider moving the monorepo INTO the WSL filesystem (e.g., ~/projects/monorepo/) when you’re ready to invest in that migration. Until then, running CC from Windows for code on D:\ is more effective than running WSL CC against /mnt/d/.

1.0 Environment Setup (Done / In Progress)

Section titled “1.0 Environment Setup (Done / In Progress)”
  • Windows settings.json created at C:\Users\Admin\.claude\settings.json matching WSL permissions
  • Slash commands created in both C:\Users\Admin\.claude\commands\ (Windows paths) and \\wsl$\Ubuntu-24.04\home\ta\.claude\commands\ (WSL paths)
  • Consider: move monorepo to WSL filesystem for dev sessions (Later)
  • Consider: when creating project-level .claude/settings.json for the KB repo, use Windows paths

Phase 2: Foundation — Eliminate Friction (Priority: Immediate)

Section titled “Phase 2: Foundation — Eliminate Friction (Priority: Immediate)”

These actions directly address the top friction points identified in your CC /insights report.

Problem: No CLAUDE.md means Claude has no guardrails about deployment architecture, testing requirements, or project conventions. Same mistakes recur across sessions.

Actions:

  • Run /init in your monorepo to bootstrap CLAUDE.md
  • Add verification rules (see below)
  • Add deployment architecture context (local vs Cloudflare, etc.)
  • Add coding standards, naming conventions, file organization rules
  • Create ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md for personal cross-project preferences
  • Schedule monthly CLAUDE.md audits (1st of each month)

Template for Monorepo CLAUDE.md:

## Workflow Rules
- After implementing changes, verify by running deployment/build scripts and checking output. Never claim "done" without testing.
- When working from task list, do final grep pass for remaining old/replaced values across ALL file types.
- Work through tasks one at a time: implement -> verify -> next. Do NOT batch.
## Deployment and Config
- For config changes (YAML, JSON, shell), diff final files after editing.
- Check for: domain names, provider names, URLs, environment values.
- [ADD YOUR SPECIFIC DEPLOYMENT ARCHITECTURE HERE]
## Stack
- [ADD YOUR TECH STACK DETAILS]
## Testing
- [ADD YOUR TEST COMMANDS AND EXPECTATIONS]

Problem: Claude claims completion while bugs linger (50% dissatisfaction rate in insights). Biggest friction is premature “done” on deployment configs.

Actions:

  • Add the verification rules above to every project CLAUDE.md
  • At start of task sessions, paste the atomic workflow prompt:
    Work through TASKS.md one item at a time. For each item:
    implement the fix, then immediately verify it works.
    Do NOT move to the next item until current one is confirmed working.
    Show status update after each item.
  • After changes, require: grep for stale refs -> run build -> cat modified files -> then report

Problem: Manual verification is inconsistent. Automate the checks.

Actions:

  • Create .claude/settings.json with postEdit hook:
    {
    "hooks": {
    "postEdit": {
    "command": "grep -rn 'TODO_REPLACE\\|FIXME\\|old-domain' --include='*.yaml' --include='*.json' --include='*.py' . || true",
    "description": "Check for stale references after every file edit"
    }
    }
    }
  • Add pre-commit hook for deployment config validation
  • Test hooks across a few sessions, refine patterns

Problem: No systematic feedback loop on AI usage patterns.

Actions:

  • Run /insights on the 1st of each month
  • Review report, extract action items
  • Update CLAUDE.md and this plan based on findings
  • Track: friction reduction, satisfaction improvement

Phase 3: Amplify — Compound Capabilities via Skills (Priority: Next 2-4 Weeks)

Section titled “Phase 3: Amplify — Compound Capabilities via Skills (Priority: Next 2-4 Weeks)”

Skills are the highest-leverage investment. Each skill you build compounds future productivity.

Actions:

  • Install Anthropic official skills: /plugin marketplace add anthropics/skills
  • Install Superpowers (Obra): /plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace
    • Adds /brainstorm and /write-plan — directly supports planning-first workflow
  • Install Playwright Skill for E2E testing
  • Evaluate frontend-design skill for UI work
  • Browse https://awesomeclaude.ai/ and https://skillsmp.com/ for relevant skills

Based on your most common session patterns (fix-from-task-list, confirm-then-implement):

Skill 1: /taskfix — Task List Fix Workflow

.claude/skills/taskfix/SKILL.md
## Task Fix Workflow
1. Read the task file specified by the user
2. For each issue, implement the fix across all relevant files
3. After ALL changes, grep for old/replaced values across codebase
4. Run the deployment or build script to verify
5. Cat final version of each modified file to confirm
6. Report checklist summary of what was done and verified
Never report completion without steps 3-5.

Skill 3: /codebase-audit — Proactive Health Check

.claude/skills/codebase-audit/SKILL.md
## Codebase Health Audit
1. Glob deployment configs, check for inconsistencies
2. Run existing test suites, capture warnings/errors
3. Scan for TODO/FIXME/HACK comments, assess staleness
4. Check JSON configs are valid and schemas haven't drifted
5. Write prioritized task list with severity ratings

Actions:

  • Use /skill-creator to build each skill with proper structure
  • Test each skill across 3-5 sessions
  • Iterate based on results (use skill-creator iterate mode)
  • Document what works in your skills knowledge

Actions:

  • Document your standard workflow: CC for terminal tasks + Cursor for visual editing
  • Set up shared context via CLAUDE.md and .cursorrules in same project
  • Use Gemini free tier for prototyping and scaffolding
  • Use GLM-4.7 ($3-6/mn) via OpenRouter for routine coding
  • Reserve Claude Pro for: complex architecture, security, business logic

Actions:

  • Restructure CLAUDE.md as roadmap (keep <100 lines, import external docs via @)
  • Create .claude/rules/ with modular rules:
    • code-style.md — coding standards
    • testing.md — test requirements
    • deployment.md — infrastructure rules
    • security.md — security requirements
  • Set up Claude web projects for different contexts (dev, writing, research)
  • Use # shortcut to add insights during sessions

Phase 4: Accelerate — Autonomous Pipelines (Priority: Month 2+)

Section titled “Phase 4: Accelerate — Autonomous Pipelines (Priority: Month 2+)”

Move from reactive fix-it cycles to proactive, autonomous workflows.

Problem: 73 sessions were “fix issues from task list” — this is automatable.

Actions:

  • Set up headless CC runs for routine task-list processing:
    Terminal window
    claude -p "Read TASKS.md and fix all listed issues. After fixing, grep entire repo for stale references. Run build and report results." --allowedTools "Edit,Read,Bash,Write,Glob"
  • Integrate into CI/CD pipeline for config validation
  • Start with low-risk tasks, expand as confidence grows

Problem: Sequential multi-file refactors are slow and miss cross-file drift.

Actions:

  • For large refactors, use TaskCreate to spawn sub-agents per language domain:
    • Python agent for backend logic
    • TypeScript agent for frontend types
    • Config agent for YAML/JSON consistency
  • Parent agent coordinates and runs integration tests after all complete
  • Use tmux for parallel CC sessions

Problem: Issues accumulate in task lists; better to catch them early.

Actions:

  • Run /codebase-audit skill at start of each week
  • Set up scheduled headless runs for:
    • Config drift detection
    • Stale reference scanning
    • Dependency mismatch checking
  • Feed audit results into TASKS.md for systematic resolution

Actions:

  • Define features clearly before ending work session
  • Run headless CC with task file overnight
  • Review results in morning
  • Best candidates: local models for cost, well-defined tasks with clear completion criteria

Phase 5: SMART DEBT Mission Acceleration (Ongoing)

Section titled “Phase 5: SMART DEBT Mission Acceleration (Ongoing)”
  • SvelteKit component generators for debt calculators
  • Content generation skill for financial education
  • Smart debt coach automated service prototype skill
  • Strategic planning skill (from Rick Moretti YT)
  • Use NotebookLM for research synthesis and podcast generation
  • Use Napkin AI for visual content from text
  • Use perspective prompting for strategic decisions
  • Multi-prompt important strategic questions across 3 models

Monthly Review Checklist (1st of each month)

Section titled “Monthly Review Checklist (1st of each month)”
  • Run CC /insights and review report
  • Update CLAUDE.md files based on insights
  • Review and iterate on custom skills
  • Audit this plan: what’s done, what’s blocked, what’s changed
  • Review subscription ROI
MetricCurrent (from /insights)Target
Satisfaction rate~50%>80%
“Premature done” incidentsFrequentRare (hooks catch them)
Sessions with CLAUDE.md0%100%
Custom skills in use05+
Monthly /insights runs01/month
  1. Run /init in monorepo and add verification rules to CLAUDE.md
  2. Install Superpowers plugin
  3. Set up one postEdit hook for stale reference detection
  4. Use verify-before-done prompt at start of next 3 sessions
  5. Run /insights next month to measure improvement