Skip to content
FSS Knowledge Base

Session Insights: Task Management System Upgrade

Section titled “Session Insights: Task Management System Upgrade”

Date: 2026-02-16 Duration: ~2 hours Type: Documentation consolidation and system design

What Was Accomplished

Section titled “What Was Accomplished”

Primary Deliverable

Section titled “Primary Deliverable”

Created comprehensive README.md v2.0 that consolidates 4 fragmented documents into a single practical guide:

  • Old README.md (folder structure only)
  • Simple_Task_Management_Quick_Reference.md (framework comparison)
  • _Next_2026-02-09_SimpleTaskMgmt_Implementation.md (implementation plan)
  • _Next3.md (7-framework research report)

Result: 637-line comprehensive guide covering small/medium/large task workflows, tool decision frameworks, templates, and best practices.

Key Design Decisions

Section titled “Key Design Decisions”

1. Preserved _Now/_Next Pattern

  • Research confirmed: temporal state (Now vs Next) is what matters
  • Mailbox metaphor (_ToAI/_FromAI) fails for solo developer workflow
  • One _Now spawns many _Next files (one-to-many, not paired 1:1)
  • Improvement: Date-stamp _Next files (_Next_YYYY-MM-DD_Topic.md)

2. Tiered Approach by Task Size

Small (5-30 min)   → _Now.md → direct work → optional _Next insights
Medium (1-4 hrs)   → ACTIVE file → work → SESSION report
Large (days/weeks) → PLAN file → phases → multiple SESSION reports

3. Tool Adoption Guidance

  • Markdown + Claude Code: 90% of tasks (zero overhead, tool-agnostic)
  • Superpowers: Complex features needing TDD enforcement (10-20 min setup cost)
  • Ralph Loop: Overnight autonomous work (setup + risk of failed state)
  • Bottom line: Defer tools until specific project justifies setup cost

Cross-Cutting Insights

Section titled “Cross-Cutting Insights”

On Documentation Consolidation

Section titled “On Documentation Consolidation”
  • Before: 4 overlapping documents, unclear which was current
  • After: Single README.md with clear versioning and archival of superseded docs
  • Lesson: Consolidate early when fragmentation appears (3+ docs covering same topic)

On Preventing Over-Engineering

Section titled “On Preventing Over-Engineering”

User constraint identified: Tendency to over-invest in tools/optimization

System design response:

  1. Clear decision tree (match overhead to task size)
  2. Tool adoption thresholds explicitly stated
  3. “Don’t over-engineer simple tasks” appears in multiple sections
  4. Examples show when NOT to use PROJECT folders, PLAN files, plugins

On Semantic File Naming

Section titled “On Semantic File Naming”

Pattern: YYYY-MM-DD_TYPE_Brief-Description.md

Why it works:

  • Chronological sorting (date prefix)
  • Purpose clarity (TYPE prefix)
  • Self-documenting (description)
  • Scales to hundreds of files without index files

Types defined: SESSION, PLAN, ACTIVE, RESEARCH, NEXT, TASK

Workflow Improvements Discovered

Section titled “Workflow Improvements Discovered”

_Now.md Evolution

Section titled “_Now.md Evolution”

Old paradigm: Container for task details + AI input/output New paradigm: Lightweight cross-project dispatcher (5-7 lines max)

Migration path:

  • Small tasks: Keep using _Now.md directly
  • Medium/large: _Now.md points to ACTIVE/PLAN files
  • Task details live in project-specific files, not _Now.md

_Next.md Evolution

Section titled “_Next.md Evolution”

Old paradigm: Task completion logs New paradigm: Cross-cutting insights and learnings

When to create _Next:

  • Workflow improvements discovered
  • AI tool limitations encountered
  • Lessons applicable across projects
  • NOT for “task 1, 2, 3 completed” (that’s SESSION report)

Template Strategy

Section titled “Template Strategy”

Created 3 levels of templates:

  1. ACTIVE - Medium tasks (1-4 hours)
  2. PLAN - Large projects (days/weeks)
  3. SESSION - Completion reports

All templates embedded in README.md (no separate template files to maintain)

What Worked

Section titled “What Worked”
  1. ✅ Plan-first approach: Having detailed implementation plan made execution straightforward
  2. ✅ Research synthesis: 7-framework research provided evidence for design decisions
  3. ✅ Archival strategy: Preserved old docs (no information loss) while cleaning up clutter
  4. ✅ Decision tree: Visual small/medium/large branching makes README scannable
  5. ✅ Real-world examples: Scenario 1/2/3 show actual usage patterns

Potential Friction Points

Section titled “Potential Friction Points”

Migration Overhead

Section titled “Migration Overhead”

Concern: Users with 50+ old _Next2.md, _Next3.md files may resist renaming Mitigation: “Backward compatibility” section explicitly says “migrate gradually, no need to retroactively fix everything”

Template Adoption

Section titled “Template Adoption”

Concern: Will users actually use the templates? Mitigation: Templates embedded in README (copy/paste ready), examples show how to fill them out

Tool Temptation

Section titled “Tool Temptation”

Concern: User may still install Superpowers/Ralph Loop prematurely Mitigation: “Decision Framework” section has explicit “Skip for” guidance and cost/benefit analysis

Recommendations for Next Phase

Section titled “Recommendations for Next Phase”

Phase 1: Trial Run (This Week)

Section titled “Phase 1: Trial Run (This Week)”
  1. Use new README.md for next 3-5 tasks
  2. Test small/medium/large workflows in practice
  3. Note any friction points or unclear guidance
  4. Adjust README.md if needed

Phase 2: Gradual Migration (This Month)

Section titled “Phase 2: Gradual Migration (This Month)”
  1. Rename _Next.md → _Next_YYYY-MM-DD_Topic.md when you next work on those topics
  2. Create first ACTIVE file for next medium-sized task
  3. Don’t retroactively fix old files (low ROI)

Phase 3: Tool Evaluation (When Needed)

Section titled “Phase 3: Tool Evaluation (When Needed)”
  1. Wait for a project that genuinely needs TDD enforcement
  2. Then install Superpowers and run one full cycle
  3. Document experience in new _Next file
  4. Decide if worth keeping for future projects

Do NOT install tools “just to try them” - wait for actual need to justify setup cost.

Files Created/Modified

Section titled “Files Created/Modified”

Created:

  • /mnt/d/FSS/KB/Business/_WorkingOn/README.md (v2.0, 637 lines)
  • /mnt/d/FSS/KB/Business/_WorkingOn/archive/ (directory)
  • /mnt/d/FSS/KB/Business/_WorkingOn/_Next_2026-02-16_Task-Management-System-Upgrade.md (this file)

Archived:

  • Simple_Task_Management_Quick_Reference.md → archive/2026-02-16_Quick_Reference.md
  • _Next3.md → archive/2026-02-16_Research_7Frameworks.md

Preserved:

  • _Next_2026-02-09_SimpleTaskMgmt_Implementation.md (historical record, already date-stamped)
  • TASKS_md_Template.md (still referenced by new README)

Success Criteria Met

Section titled “Success Criteria Met”

✅ Single source of truth: README.md consolidates all best practices ✅ Clear decision tree: Small/medium/large workflows explicitly defined ✅ Tool guidance: When to use Superpowers/Ralph Loop vs plain markdown ✅ Templates provided: ACTIVE, PLAN, SESSION all included ✅ Prevents over-engineering: Multiple sections discourage premature optimization ✅ Backward compatible: Old _Now/_Next still works, gradual migration path

Key Takeaway

Section titled “Key Takeaway”

The right amount of process is the minimum needed for the current task.

  • Small task (5-30 min): _Now.md + direct work
  • Medium task (1-4 hours): ACTIVE file → SESSION report
  • Large project (days/weeks): PLAN → phases → SESSION reports
  • Advanced tools: Only when specific project justifies setup cost

This system scales from quick KB edits to multi-week feature development without forcing one-size-fits-all overhead.

Resources

Section titled “Resources”
  • New README: D:\FSS\KB\Business\_WorkingOn\README.md
  • Archived research: archive/2026-02-16_Research_7Frameworks.md
  • Implementation plan: _Next_2026-02-09_SimpleTaskMgmt_Implementation.md
  • Templates: TASKS_md_Template.md