Sitemap

Claude Code + Visual IDE + Duck Agents = 5 Projects Simultaneously: Building Quack

The first Visual IDE for multi-agent orchestration. Each agent is a duck 🦆. When it finishes, it quacks. Private alpha now — closed beta launching November.

While You Wait for Claude Code, I Ship 5 Projects: Introducing Quack.

In the mood for Quack

I’m Alek, a Product Manager building enterprise software across Europe. I work daily with Vue, Nuxt, Next, now Swift, Supabase, and n8n, using AI-assisted coding through Claude Code to ship faster.

Cursor and Claude Code are incredible tools. But here’s the problem: you’re staring at a terminal, watching text scroll by, waiting for your one agent to finish.

What if instead, you had a Visual IDE where:

• You could see 5 agents working simultaneously
• Each agent had a personality (literally, they’re ducks 🦆)
• Plans and todos updated visually in real-time
• When an agent finished, you heard a satisfying ‘QUACK’

And what if you could work on multiple projects with multiple agents per project — meaning 10–15 AI ducks working in parallel while you conducted the symphony?

That’s Quack. And I’ve been testing it in private alpha for a week.

In seven days, I shipped work that used to take 3–4 months. Closed beta launches in November — join the Discord now to be first in line. You can find more about my work at https://quack.build

What You’ll Learn Today

• Why visual IDE beats terminal: cognitive load reduction through duck agents
• Multi-agents PER PROJECT: not 5 agents, but 10–15 working in parallel
• Real proof: 5 projects with multiple duck agents each (all named and customized)
• The six killer features: Visual IDE, Duck Agents, Plan Mode, Multi-agents per project, PiP, Telegram
• How to join Discord now for November closed beta access (limited spots)

The Visual IDE Problem (Not Just Waiting)

Let me show you what happens when you work with Cursor or Claude Code on multiple projects:

Morning: Open Claude Code terminal for Project A. Watch text scroll by. Wait 10 minutes. Parse the output to find errors. Review changes. Wait again.

Afternoon: Need to update Project B. Open new terminal. Reload mental context (20 minutes lost). Watch more text scroll. Wait. Try to remember what Terminal 1 was doing.

Evening: Client urgent request for Project C. Open third terminal. Context switch cost: 30 minutes. Now you’re parsing three terminal windows trying to track what’s happening where.

Reality: You’re spending 60–70% of your time WAITING and mentally parsing terminal output.

Sound familiar?

Cursor and Claude Code are fantastic for deep, focused work on a single project. But when you’re managing multiple projects — the reality for most developers — you need something different.

Here’s the deeper problem: Claude Code is a terminal interface. You’re staring at text scrolling by, hoping to catch errors in the stream. You’re reading line by line to understand what’s happening.

💡 Key Concept: The bottleneck isn’t just AI speed — it’s that terminal interfaces force you to parse text output sequentially when you need to track multiple projects visually at a glance.

This is why Quack is a Visual IDE

Have you felt this frustration? I’m curious about your multi-project workflow — share your experience in the comments.

⏰ Quick Timeline Note

• Right Now (October): Private alpha — just me using and building Quack
• November: Closed beta launch with limited external testers
• Discord: Pre-registration for beta access opens now

If you’re reading this and thinking “I need this,” join the Discord. Beta invites go out in November, first come first served.

Why I Built Quack: Visual Multi-Agent Orchestration

Most developers I know manage 3–5 active projects:

• Your main project
• Side projects
• Client work
• Personal tools
• Open source contributions

But our tools treat us like we only work on one thing at a time.

And even worse: our tools are terminals. Text-based. Sequential. You read output line by line.

I needed a Visual IDE where:

• I can see 5–10 agents working simultaneously — visually
• Each agent has a name and personality (duck agents!)
• Plans and todos update in real-time — not hidden in scrolling text
• I know instantly which agent needs attention by glancing at colored duck badges
• Multiple agents work on the SAME project (not just different projects)

Why watch text scroll when you can conduct a visual symphony of duck agents?

That’s Quack.

Introducing Quack (Currently in Private Alpha)

Quack isn’t replacing your IDE — it’s a Visual IDE for orchestrating multiple AI chat sessions.

Before we dive into features: I’ve been using Quack in private alpha for the past week. Right now, it’s just me — building, breaking things, fixing them, and shipping features daily. This is the rawest form of the product, and honestly, it’s already transforming how I work.

We have also a Website right now## Quack - Visual GUI for Claude Code AI Development

Work on multiple projects while Claude thinks. The only desktop app for parallel Claude Code sessions with visual…

quack.build

View original

First: Meet the Duck Agents 🦆

Here’s the thing that makes Quack actually delightful to use: your agents are ducks.

Not metaphorically. Literally. Each AI chat session is assigned to a duck agent that you can:

• Name: “Swift Duck”, “Bug Hunter”, “Documentation Quacker”
• Customize sound: Deep quack, high-pitched chirp, double quack
• Color-code: Visual badges so you instantly recognize each project

When an agent finishes a task? QUACK.

Working late and your Swift Duck finishes compiling? QUACK.

Checking PostHog data while on a bathroom break? Your phone buzzes. quack quack.

It sounds silly. It’s surprisingly motivating. When you hear 5 different duck sounds throughout the day, you feel like you’re conducting an orchestra of productivity.

And yes, I named one of my ducks “Quackintosh” for the Mac app project. No regrets.

💡 Key Concept: Duck agents aren’t just aesthetic — they reduce cognitive load. Instead of parsing “Terminal 3”, you glance and see “🦆 Swift Duck (deep QUACK)” and instantly know which project it is.

Visual recognition beats text parsing every time

What Makes Quack Different from Claude Code

Here’s the paradigm shift:

Claude Code: Terminal-based, one project at a time, text output
Cursor: IDE integration, one project at a time, embedded chat
Quack: Visual IDE, multi-project, multi-agent per project, duck orchestration

Let me break down the six killer features:

1. Visual IDE (Not a Terminal)

Claude Code is a terminal interface. Quack is a Visual IDE with:

• Plan mode visualization: See the agent’s thinking process laid out visually
• Real-time todo tracking: Watch each task update as the agent progresses
• Beautiful, organized UI: Actually enjoyable to look at for hours
• Status at a glance: No more parsing terminal output

You’re not parsing text — you’re scanning visually.

When you work with Claude Code, you see this:

Analyzing codebase...
Reading file src/components/App.tsx...
Generating code...
Writing tests...

When you work with Quack, you see:

🦆 Swift Duck — Plan Mode

1. ✅ Analyze SwiftUI requirements
2. ✅ Generate navigation structure
3. 🔄 Implement data models
4. ⏳ Write API integration
5. ⏳ Add error handling

Real-time updates. As Swift Duck works, you watch tasks check off. You see EXACTLY where each agent is in their workflow.

Meanwhile, 🦆 PostHog Duckling shows its own plan in another window. And 🦆 Flow Debugger is tracking down that bug.

All visible. All organized. All beautiful.

This isn’t just aesthetic — it’s cognitive load reduction. You can scan 5 projects visually in seconds. With terminals, you’re reading line by line.

💬 Shareable Quote: “Claude Code is a terminal. Quack is a Visual IDE with duck agents. That’s the difference.”

— Why visual matters

An overview of Quack App

2. Duck Agents with Personality

Each agent has a name, custom quack sound, and visual identity. Makes managing 10–15 simultaneous agents actually tractable and fun.

Example from this morning:

• 🦆 Swift Duck (deep authoritative QUACK): Compiling iOS app
• 🦆 PostHog Duckling (cheerful quick quacks): Analyzing user data
• 🦆 Jack the CEO Duck (serious focused quack): Building Quack features
• 🦆 Writer Duck (thoughtful literary quack): Drafting this article

When I hear that deep QUACK, I know my Swift build is ready. When the duckling chirps, PostHog data is loaded.

3. Multi-Agents Per Project

Here’s where it gets wild: multiple agents per project.

You’re not limited to one agent per project. You can have:

• Agent 1: Implementing the new feature
• Agent 2: Writing tests
• Agent 3: Updating documentation
• Agent 4: Refactoring old code

All working on the same project simultaneously.

So the math becomes:

• 5 projects × 2–3 agents each = 10–15 duck agents working in parallel

This is why I’m shipping work that used to take months in days. I’m not 3–4x faster — I’m 10–15x parallelized.

💬 Shareable Quote: “Not just multi-project. Multi-agent per project. That’s 10–15x parallelization.”

— The math that changes everything

The plan mode with agents tab

4. Multi-Project Interactive Chat Management

Each project gets its own interactive AI chat with specialized agents. Your Swift agent knows Swift. Your ERP agent knows your business logic. Your marketing agent knows PostHog and Brevo. No context bleed. No waiting.

5. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) Mode

Keep your agents visible while doing anything else on your Mac. Browse docs, check email, scroll Twitter — your duck agents stay in view. You never lose track of what’s happening across projects.

6. Telegram Integration

Your duck agents notify you wherever you are. Even bathroom breaks become productive with Telegram notifications. Your agents keep working while you… take care of business. 😅

Kitchen for coffee? Telegram tells you which duck needs review.

Telegram message on my Garmin (I’m an Apple guy, but I use to cycling, and Garmin is a Garmin …)

💬 Discord Auto-Posting

Ship a feature, type /discord, and your update posts to the community automatically—with screenshots. Once the closed beta launches in November, the Discord community will be the hub for sharing workflows, tips, and real-time project updates.

The result? From months to days isn’t magic — it’s visual parallel processing with duck orchestration.

💡 Key Concept: Quack shifts you from sequential development (Project A → Project B → Project C) to visual parallel orchestration (Projects A, B, C, D, E simultaneously with 2–3 agents each).

Even in private alpha as the solo user, I’m seeing 10–15x parallelization gains

Want early access when beta launches? Join Discord now to be first in line for November beta access: https://discord.gg/GF4hY5gy. Limited spots, first come first served.

Discord channel

Real Proof: 5 Projects I’m Building Right Now

Let me show you exactly what I’m managing simultaneously during this private alpha phase — and what you’ll be able to do once closed beta opens in November:

1. Quack Itself — The Meta Loop

🦆 Active Agents:

• Jack the CEO Duck (deep authoritative QUACK) — Building core features
• UI Designer Duck (cheerful artistic quack) — Refining visual interface

What I see: Plan mode showing feature implementation steps, real-time todo tracking for each file change, beautiful visual progress

Yes, I’m using Quack to build Quack. Every feature you’ll see in the beta exists because I needed it yesterday:

• Duck agent customization — Name them, customize their quacks
• Visual plan mode — See agent thinking visually, not as text
• Picture-in-Picture mode — Keep agents visible while browsing docs
• Telegram notifications — Get pinged when any duck needs attention
• Global project dashboard — See all duck agents at once

The meta-loop: Need a feature → Build it → Use it immediately. Feedback cycle measured in hours.

While Jack the CEO Duck refactors core features, UI Designer Duck is polishing the visual interface. The PiP window shows both duck agents’ progress side by side, with their plans updating in real-time.

This is how Quack evolves: built by multi-project developers, for multi-project developers.

When closed beta launches in November, the Discord community will be testing features and shaping the roadmap together. Join now to be part of it from day one.

2. Swift Mobile App for C&C ERP — First Time Using Native Swift

🦆 Active Agents:

• Swift Duck (cheerful quick quacks) — Building iOS features
• Test Duckling (precise methodical quack) — Writing unit tests

What I see: Swift Duck’s plan showing UI component implementation, Test Duckling’s real-time test results updating visually

Here’s the crazy part: This was my first time writing native Swift (I came from Flutter).

Today? My team says the retail channel app is “sta venendo una bomba” (roughly: “it’s coming out amazing”).

How?

Swift Duck (my Swift-specialized agent):

• Translates product requirements into idiomatic Swift
• Explains iOS-specific patterns in context
• Reviews architectural decisions through a Swift lens
• Catches when I’m thinking in Vue/JavaScript patterns

While Swift Duck compiles and runs tests, I’m reviewing PostHog analytics with PostHog Duckling in another window. When my phone buzzes with a Telegram notification and I hear that cheerful quick quack, I know Swift Duck is ready for review.

I’m not learning Swift traditionally. I’m learning it while shipping production code.

💡 Key Concept: With Quack’s specialized duck agents, “knowing a language” shifts from “memorizing syntax” to “understanding product requirements and architecture.”

Once beta launches, developers will use this approach for Rust, Go, Kotlin, and more — join Discord now to be among the first

3. https://quack.build Website — Marketing Infrastructure

🦆 Active Agents:

• PostHog Duck (analytical data-driven quack) — Implementing analytics
• Brevo Duck (friendly communicative quack) — Setting up email automation

What I see: Two side-by-side visual chats, PostHog Duck’s plan showing funnel implementation steps, Brevo Duck’s todo list for email sequences

The Quack marketing site has TWO duck agents working in parallel:

PostHog Duck helped with:

• User behavior tracking: Conversion funnels, event tracking
• Analytics dashboards: Real-time beta signup metrics
• A/B testing setup: Testing messaging and CTAs

Brevo Duck handled:

• Welcome sequences: Automated email flows
• Feature announcements: Newsletter templates
• Beta launch communications: Drip campaigns

While PostHog Duck deploys analytics updates, Brevo Duck is writing email copy, and I’m fixing ERP bugs with Flow Debugger Duck in another window. The global dashboard shows all duck agents’ progress at once — visually.

These ducks know our marketing stack. When I say “set up a funnel for beta signups,” PostHog Duck knows I mean PostHog, knows our event structure, implements correctly.

Old timeline: 1 week for marketing infrastructure
With Quack in private alpha (2 ducks working in parallel): One afternoon

4. Flow ERP — Enterprise Software That Can’t Break

🦆 Active Agents:

• Flow Debugger Duck (serious focused quack) — Hunting down bugs
• API Integration Duck (methodical technical quack) — Updating endpoints

What I see: Debugger Duck’s visual plan tracking each bug fix attempt, API Duck’s todo list showing integration updates

Flow is my company’s mission-critical ERP system running operations. Complex, enterprise-scale, always evolving:

This week with my Flow ducks:

• Debugger Duck: Fixed multi-country currency conversion bug (visual plan showed each debugging step)
• API Integration Duck: Improved B2B workflow automation (real-time todo updates as each endpoint was updated)
• Both worked on retail store internal apps simultaneously

These ducks know our entire codebase, business logic, database schema, API contracts.

While Debugger Duck runs ERP test suites (takes 15 minutes), I’m writing this article with Writer Duck. The PiP window keeps me informed about test progress — visually, not by parsing terminal text.

It feels like pairing with 10 senior developers who’ve been on their projects for years.

5. This Article — Writing With Writer Duck

🦆 Active Agent:

• Writer Duck (thoughtful literary quack) — Crafting this article

What I see: Article outlines visually structured, real-time markdown preview, Writer Duck’s plan showing section-by-section progress

I have a duck agent dedicated to my Obsidian vault:

• Helps structure Medium articles (like this one — Writer Duck is helping me right now!)
• Creates intelligent daily journal entries
• Surfaces relevant notes when working on projects
• Assists with strategic planning and reflections

Right now, Writer Duck is helping me write about Quack while my other duck agents work on their projects.

Check your Telegram. Glance at the PiP window with color-coded duck badges. See which duck quacked. Review. Conduct. Ship.

The meta levels are getting ridiculous. 🤯

💬 Shareable Quote: “Each agent is a duck. When it finishes, it quacks. I have 10 ducks working right now.”

— The future of multi-agent development

Visual Orchestration: Why This Beats Terminal Management

Let me zoom in on how the visual approach changes everything:

📺 Picture-in-Picture: Never Lose Visual Context

The problem with Cursor/Claude Code: When you switch to your browser to check docs, you lose visibility into what your agent is doing. You’re parsing terminal text when you come back.

Quack’s solution: PiP keeps your duck agents visible while you do ANYTHING else. Browse Stack Overflow, check email, read Medium — your duck agents stay in view with their visual plans and status badges.

Real scenario: I’m reading PostHog docs in Chrome (full screen). My PiP window shows:

• 🦆 Swift Duck: Compiling ✅ Ready for review (deep QUACK heard)
• 🦆 Jack the CEO Duck: Running tests ⏳ Still working (2/12 tests passed — visible)
• 🦆 PostHog Duck: Deployed ✅ Check analytics (cheerful quack!)
• 🦆 Flow Debugger: Waiting for input ⚠️ Needs attention
• 🦆 Writer Duck: Auto-saving ✅ Keep reading

I never lose the global view — and I know which duck is which instantly. This is visual conducting.

The PiP window always present

📱 Telegram: Your Duck Agents in Your Pocket

The problem: You step away from your computer. Agents finish work. You don’t know until you come back.

Quack’s solution: Telegram bot pings you the moment any duck agent changes state — with their name and personality.

Real scenario from this morning:

• 9:30 AM: Start Swift Duck compile. Go make coffee.
• 9:33 AM: Telegram ping + cheerful quack: “🦆 Swift Duck: Build succeeded. 3 tests passing. Review?”
• 9:35 AM: Still in kitchen. Reply: “Deploy to TestFlight”
• 9:40 AM: Telegram ping: “🦆 Swift Duck: Deployed to TestFlight. Build 47 live.”

I shipped a build without being at my desk.

Even bathroom breaks become productive with Telegram notifications. Your duck agents keep working while you… take care of business. 😅

🌐 Global Dashboard: Visual Symphony

The problem: With multiple terminal windows, you lose track of what’s happening where. You’re parsing text output.

Quack’s solution: One unified visual view of all projects, all duck agents, all progress — with plan mode and real-time todos.

What I see right now (visual, not text):

🦆 Swift Duck [Swift App]          🔄 Running tests (2/12 passed) - Plan visible
🦆 Jack the CEO Duck [Quack]       ✅ Waiting for review - Todo: 3/5 complete
🦆 PostHog Duck [Marketing]        ✅ Deployed to production - Success!
🦆 Flow Debugger [Flow ERP]        ⚠️  Needs input - Plan shows debugging strategy
🦆 Writer Duck [Article]           🔄 Drafting section - Real-time markdown preview

Glance. Recognize duck. See visual status. Decide. Act. Conduct.

This is what visual parallel development looks like — not terminal text parsing.

💡 Key Concept: Visual IDE + Duck Agents + Plan Mode + Telegram transforms you from a developer into a conductor. You’re not parsing terminal output anymore — you’re orchestrating visually.

This is why Quack feels like a different paradigm, not just a tool

This reminds me of when I first tried AI-assisted coding — the shift from “writing every line” to “reviewing and directing” felt revolutionary. Quack is the same leap: from “parsing terminals” to “visual orchestration”.

The Reality Check: We’re in Private Alpha

Full transparency: Quack is in private alpha right now. I’m the only person using it. Things break. Some ducks don’t quack reliably yet. The plan mode sometimes doesn’t update perfectly. Features are half-baked. The UI changes daily.

But even with these issues, the visual feedback and duck personality system make managing 10+ agents dramatically easier than terminal-based approaches. I’m shipping 5 projects simultaneously with 10–15 duck agents and doing work that used to take months.

In November, I’m opening closed beta to a small group of external testers. If you want in, join the Discord now. I’m looking for developers who aren’t afraid of rough edges and want to help shape the future of visual multi-agent orchestration.

What “closed beta in November” means:

• Limited spots for external testers (first come, first served via Discord)
• Visual features are functional but evolving rapidly based on feedback
• Some ducks might not quack perfectly (and you’ll help me fix them)
• UI is beautiful but not fully polished
• Your feedback directly shapes the product
• You’re not just getting early access — you’re shaping the tool

Why join Discord NOW for November beta?

Because even in my solo private alpha testing, I’m seeing 10–15x parallelization gains over managing projects sequentially with Cursor or Claude Code. Once beta opens, the Discord community will become the feedback hub where we build this together.

Discord will be where beta testers:

• Report bugs (I fix them within days)
• Suggest duck personalities and features (I build them if they make sense)
• Share duck agent configurations and naming schemes (learn from others)
• Celebrate wins (shipping multiple projects per week with duck orchestras!)

Honest question: Have you built or used beta products? What’s your tolerance for rough edges if the core value (visual orchestration + duck agents) is there? Let me know in the comments.

Why This Changes Everything: Terminal Text → Visual Orchestration

Here’s the paradigm shift:

Old model (Cursor/Claude Code):
“I am a developer who writes code with AI assistance, one terminal at a time, parsing text output”

New model (Quack):
“I am a conductor who orchestrates specialized duck agents across multiple projects simultaneously, seeing their plans and progress visually”

The difference is profound:

With sequential terminal development:

• Project A progress → blocks → switch to Project B
• Context switching costs 20–45 minutes
• Only one project active at a time
• You wait while parsing terminal text
• You read line-by-line to understand status
• Velocity: 1 feature per project per month

With visual parallel orchestration:

• All projects active simultaneously (5 projects × 2–3 agents each)
• Zero context switching overhead
• You work while duck agents work
• Visual scanning beats text parsing
• Duck personalities make agents instantly recognizable
• Plan mode shows agent thinking visually
• Velocity: 10–15 duck agents shipping simultaneously

For solo developers and small teams, this is the inflection point.

You’re no longer constrained by how many hours you personally can code. You’re constrained by how well you conduct a visual orchestra of specialized duck agents.

That’s the game Quack lets you play.

The Numbers: From Months to Days

Let me be transparent: I don’t track every minute.

But I can tell you with certainty: the work I shipped this week would have taken 3–4 months in my old workflow.

Why so much faster?

It’s not coding speed. Claude Code and Cursor already made coding faster.

It’s visual parallelization and elimination of dead time:

• ✅ Zero context-switching overhead (20–45 min per switch)
• ✅ Zero “where was I?” reorientation (15–30 min per project)
• ✅ Zero waiting while duck agents work (use that time on other projects)
• ✅ Zero parsing terminal text to understand status (visual scanning is instant)
• ✅ Zero mental tracking of “which terminal is which” (duck agents are instantly recognizable)
• ✅ Multiple agents per project simultaneously (not just multi-project)

The math: Not 3–4x faster. 10–15x parallelized.

• 5 projects
• 2–3 duck agents per project
• Visual orchestration instead of terminal text parsing
• = 10–15 specialized agents working simultaneously

You’re spending all your time on high-value decisions (conducting) instead of waiting, context switching, or parsing terminal output.

This isn’t hypothetical — I’m experiencing these gains right now in private alpha. Once beta launches in November, you’ll be able to test these results yourself.

Get Early Access (Beta Launching November)

Here’s where we are right now:

✅ Private alpha ongoing (just me testing and building)
✅ Closed beta launches in November with limited external testers
✅ Discord pre-registration open NOW
✅ New features shipping daily based on my testing
🚀 Public release: TBD after beta feedback

I’m looking for November beta testers who:

• Manage 3+ active projects (perfect fit for visual orchestration)
• Get frustrated parsing terminal text across multiple sessions (you’ll love visual duck agents)
• Want to be part of building the future of visual AI orchestration
• Aren’t afraid of rough edges (your feedback shapes the product)
• Think naming duck agents and hearing them quack sounds delightful (welcome home)

If that’s you, join Discord NOW to secure your spot for November.

Why join Discord today?

• ✅ First priority when beta opens in November (limited spots — first come, first served)
• ✅ Shape the product with direct feedback to me
• ✅ See daily development updates via Discord bot (I use /discord constantly during private alpha)
• ✅ Once beta launches: learn from other multi-project developers (agent configs, workflows, tips)
• ✅ Be part of the founding community from day one
• ✅ Lifetime perks for early Discord members (details coming)

Discord isn’t just pre-registration — it’s where the community will form.

Once closed beta launches in November, we’ll be sharing:

• Duck agent naming schemes and personality templates (don’t start from scratch)
• Multi-project visual orchestration workflows (learn from others)
• 10–15x parallelization metrics (see real results)
• Bug reports and fixes (we solve problems together — including quack sounds!)
• Feature requests (your duck ideas become features)

This is community-driven development. You’re not just a user — you’re a builder.

💡 Key Concept: The best products are built WITH users, not FOR users. Join Discord now to be part of the building process from the moment beta opens.

Early Discord members get lifetime benefits — join before November to qualify

Join Discord for November beta access: https://discord.gg/GF4hY5gy

Ready to Stop Context Switching?

Quack is currently in private alpha (just me testing and building). Closed beta launches in November with limited spots for external testers.

Want Early Access?

👉 Join the Discord community now to:

• Get first priority when beta opens in November
• See daily development updates via Discord bot
• Shape the product with your feedback
• Learn from other multi-project developers
• Be part of the founding community

👉 Visit quack.build to learn more about the vision

👉 Follow me on Medium for updates on the beta launch

P.S. Beta invites go out in November via Discord. Join now to be first in line — spots will be limited.

P.P.S. My Swift Duck? Just quacked. The app compiled successfully while I was writing this sentence. PostHog Duck is still analyzing. Writer Duck is waiting for my next prompt. This is the future.

P.P.P.S. If you’re reading this on Medium, leave a comment about which feature excites you most (Duck Agents, Visual Plan Mode, or Multi-agents per project). I’m genuinely curious — and comments help the algorithm. 🙏

Found this helpful? There’s more where this came from. Check out my other articles on building enterprise tools and AI-assisted development.

👉 Follow me on Medium and Substack for weekly insights on Product Management and modern development workflows.

💬 Drop a comment below — I read and respond to every one. What’s your biggest challenge with managing multiple projects?

🌐 Want to see more of my work? Visit alekdob.com for case studies and detailed project breakdowns.

Clap if this helped you — it helps other developers find these insights! 👏

Product engineer. Full-stack builder. Spreading the vibe coding culture in Italy and in the world🍕. Claude Code,Nuxt and Vue ♥️ 👩🚀

More from Alek Dobrohotov

Recommended from Medium

[

See more recommendations

](https://medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc—fd78b940fdb9---------------------------------------)