Skip to content

Sitemap Mastodon## Synthetic Futures

Synthetic Futures

Explores the possibilities and implications of artificial intelligence

The terminal agent that’s 3x faster and actually stays online when you need it

Section titled “The terminal agent that’s 3x faster and actually stays online when you need it”

I was a Claude Code fanboy. I mean, who wasn’t? When it first dropped, it felt like magic. An AI that could code directly in your terminal? Revolutionary stuff.

But here’s the thing about being an early adopter: you get burned. A lot.

After months of dealing with Claude Code’s quirks, memory hogging, and those lovely Anthropic outages (seriously, check their status page — it’s like a Christmas tree of red alerts), I stumbled onto something that completely changed my workflow.

Meet Warp 2.0 — and no, this isn’t another “shiny new tool” post. This is me telling you about the terminal agent that actually delivers on all those promises Claude Code made but couldn’t keep.

It’s 2 PM on a Tuesday. I’m deep in a coding session, multiple projects open, when suddenly Claude Code decides it needs to eat up 4GB of my RAM for a simple file edit. Then — plot twist — Anthropic goes down for maintenance.

Sound familiar?

That’s when I realized I needed something more reliable. Something that didn’t treat my system resources like an all-you-can-eat buffet. Something that actually worked when I needed it to.

Warp started as a terminal emulator four years ago. But with their 2.0 update? They’ve created something special — a full agentic development environment that makes your terminal the center of everything.

Think of it this way: instead of wrapping an AI around a bloated code editor, Warp wraps it around the terminal itself. And that’s genius, because the terminal is where real work gets done anyway.

Here’s where things get interesting. Warp doesn’t just talk a big game — they back it up:

  • #1 position on Terminal Bench
  • 71% on SWE Bench Verified
  • Scores above Claude Code on leaderboards

https://www.tbench.ai/

Yeah, you read that right. Warp actually outperforms Claude Code in head-to-head comparisons.

Unlike Claude Code’s one-size-fits-all approach, Warp gives you options:

Pure shell commands without AI interference. Want to run ls or rm? Just do it. No AI trying to “help” you with basic commands.

This is where the magic happens. Give it a natural language prompt, and it spawns an agent that can accomplish almost anything. Need to cut silences from audio using ffmpeg but don’t remember the syntax? Just ask.

The smartest feature of all. It automatically detects whether you’re running a shell command or asking for AI help. No more accidentally triggering the AI when you just want to check your git status.

Why Warp Crushes Claude Code (And I’m Not Being Dramatic)

Section titled “Why Warp Crushes Claude Code (And I’m Not Being Dramatic)”

Claude Code locks you into Anthropic’s models. That’s it. When they’re down, you’re down.

Warp? Choose from Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, or whatever model works best for your task. When Anthropic has another one of their frequent outages, you just switch models and keep working.

Built on Rust, Warp is lightning fast and resource-efficient. I can run multiple agents, split screens, and manage different projects without my laptop turning into a space heater.

Claude Code doing the same thing? Good luck with that.

==Here’s something Claude Code can’t do: run multiple agents simultaneously==. With Warp, I can split my screen, run two different agents on two different projects, or have one agent working while I run terminal commands on the side.

The rocket icon gives you a clean overview of all active agents and processes. It’s like having a mission control center for your development work.

Let me show you exactly what I mean with a real example. I needed to add a light theme toggle to my Tiptalk app — a simple but common task.

Warp’s approach:

  1. I asked it to add the toggle
  2. It read the relevant files
  3. It implemented the feature correctly
  4. It worked perfectly on the first try

Claude Code’s approach:

  1. I asked it to do the same thing
  2. It struggled with the implementation
  3. No local storage for state persistence
  4. The toggle didn’t actually work

Same task. Two very different outcomes.

Warp indexes your git-tracked files to help agents understand your project structure. It doesn’t store your code — just file names and structure. This means better context-aware responses, especially in larger codebases.

This is where you can set up MCP servers, create custom workflows, and save frequently used prompts. Think of it as your personal automation hub.

Themes, planning models, interface tweaks — Warp lets you make it yours. Unlike Claude Code’s “take it or leave it” approach.

Here’s where Warp really shines:

  • Free tier: Actually generous (unlike most “free” AI tools)
  • $15 plan: 2500 AI requests — best in class for this price point
  • $40 plan: 10K requests — the sweet spot for serious developers

Compare that to Claude Code’s pricing, and you’ll see why I made the switch.

My Honest Take After 2 Months of Daily Use

Section titled “My Honest Take After 2 Months of Daily Use”

I’ve been using Warp as my primary development environment for three months now. Here’s what I’ve learned:

The good:

  • Genuinely faster than any other terminal agent I’ve tried
  • Multiple model support saves me when services go down
  • Memory usage that doesn’t kill my other applications
  • Split-screen functionality that actually works

The not-so-good:

  • Learning curve if you’re used to traditional terminals
  • Some advanced features require the paid plans

The verdict: I’m not going back to Claude Code. The reliability, performance, and flexibility gap is just too wide.

Setting up Warp is straightforward:

  1. Download for your OS (Windows, Mac, Linux — they’ve got you covered)
  2. Install and run through the quick setup
  3. Choose your preferred model
  4. Start with auto mode to get a feel for how it works

Pro tip: Start with simple tasks to understand how the different modes work. Don’t jump into complex multi-file refactoring on day one.

Look, I’m not saying Claude Code is terrible. It was innovative for its time. But “ for its time ” is the key phrase here.

Warp 2.0 represents the next evolution of terminal-based AI agents. It’s faster, more reliable, more flexible, and often cheaper than the alternatives.

If you’re still dealing with Claude Code’s limitations — the memory issues, the single-model lock-in, the frequent service interruptions — you owe it to yourself to try Warp.

Your terminal is where the real work happens anyway. Might as well make it intelligent.

Ready to make the switch? Download Warp today and see what terminal-based AI development should actually feel like. Trust me, your future self will thank you.

Synthetic Futures

Synthetic Futures

Last published 2 days ago

Explores the possibilities and implications of artificial intelligence

Learnt - Insight - Write..etc.

Talbot Stevens

What are your thoughts?

seems like a commercial for warp

20

warp is much worse than Claude Code in complex codebases, tried it and immediately canceled subscription. It s memorization system is horrible, and forgets important information after just 3 messages. Not saying Claude Code is perfect, but Warp is…

18

Warp is certainly very good and very professionally made. However, you can only use it with a paid subscription and can only choose from the few Frontier models provided. If money is no object, it's definitely an optimal solution. Otherwise: too

7

More from Andy Nguyen and Synthetic Futures

Section titled “More from Andy Nguyen and Synthetic Futures”

[

See more recommendations

](https://medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc—8b6f0780d191---------------------------------------)