Proof E — the shared view engine, same outline as Proof D
Section titled “Proof E — the shared view engine, same outline as Proof D”Phase 1 of
ecco-notepads-build. Same 10-item, 4-level outline asecco-treeview-proof.md, but View 6/7 are now two-line calls to the shared engine atFocus/scripts/ecco-view.jsinstead of ~25 lines of inlined JS each. The tree-walking logic inside that engine is unchanged from the proof — only wrapped in a function and looped perdv.pages(source)page, so it can run over a folder of notepads later, not just one file.Headless check already passed (
node Focus/scripts/ecco-view.test.mjs— View 6, View 7, and ashowAncestors:falsecase, all PASS) — that proves the algorithm. This file is the one thing the harness can’t check: doesdv.pages()+dv.view()actually reach these items and render the same tree Obsidian rendered for Proof D. Obsidian CLI wasn’t registered yet (Phase 0), so this needs Talbot’s eyes.
The outline — identical to Proof D
Section titled “The outline — identical to Proof D”- Chilton partnership [abc:: A] [status:: WIP] [focus:: today]
- Draft the follow-up email [abc:: A] [status:: WIP] [focus:: today]
- Confirm the send date with Talbot [abc:: A] [status:: waiting] [focus:: today]
- Check his Friday calendar block [abc:: B] [status:: todo] [focus:: thisWeek]
- Attach deck v2 [abc:: B] [status:: todo] [focus:: thisWeek]
- Confirm the send date with Talbot [abc:: A] [status:: waiting] [focus:: today]
- Agree the revenue split [abc:: A] [status:: todo] [focus:: thisWeek]
- Draft the follow-up email [abc:: A] [status:: WIP] [focus:: today]
- Rate scanner — daily ops check [abc:: A] [status:: recurring] [focus:: today]
- Refresh Filter+Focus (4.5 months stale) [abc:: B] [status:: todo] [focus:: thisWeek]
- Buy new label printer [abc:: C] [status:: todo] [action:: buy] [focus:: someday]
View 6 — “Today only”, filtered and nested — now a two-line call
Section titled “View 6 — “Today only”, filtered and nested — now a two-line call”dv.view("Focus/scripts/ecco-view", { field: "focus", value: "today", source: '"Core/Processes/Projects/Focus/proofs/ecco-view-engine-proof"'});Expected — identical to Proof D’s View 6:
- Chilton partnership - Draft the follow-up email - Confirm the send date with Talbot- Rate scanner — daily ops checkView 7 — “Waiting”, one deep match, ancestors italic
Section titled “View 7 — “Waiting”, one deep match, ancestors italic”dv.view("Focus/scripts/ecco-view", { field: "status", value: "waiting", source: '"Core/Processes/Projects/Focus/proofs/ecco-view-engine-proof"'});Expected — identical to Proof D’s View 7:
- *Chilton partnership* - *Draft the follow-up email* - Confirm the send date with TalbotRender check for Talbot
Section titled “Render check for Talbot”- Do View 6 and View 7 above render exactly what Proof D rendered (same four items / same single-match-with-ancestors)?
- If either shows a JavaScript error instead of the list, paste the error — the algorithm is proven headlessly; a failure here is
dv.view()/dv.pages()API surface, not the tree logic.