Obsidian Automation Guide — Buy vs Piecemeal Decision
Section titled “Obsidian Automation Guide — Buy vs Piecemeal Decision”Decision
Section titled “Decision”Verdict: piecemeal upgrade, not the Obsidian Starter Kit (OSK, €199.99 Essentials / €249.99 Premium). Reached after 3 rounds of pushback from Talbot, each producing new verified evidence rather than re-assertion.
Reasoning that held up
Section titled “Reasoning that held up”- OSK’s AI-native layer (agents-with-identity, skills library, receptionist routing, AGENTS.md-as-SSOT) is architecturally the same pattern KB-OS already runs in production via dept
JOB_DESCRIPTION.md/Staff/charter chains + skills — not a gap to fill. - The transferable skill-writing methodology is published free (verified: “How I Build AI Skills That Actually Work” gives the actual 5-step recipe, not a teaser). What’s paid is ~375 skills written against Dubois’ PARA/Zettelkasten schema — schema-locked, doesn’t transfer to KB-OS’s dept-routed SMTM structure.
- Factual correction found in round 3: “Hermes-like autonomy” (always-on, 24/7 agent) is not part of OSK at all — OpenClaw/Hermes Agent are separate, free, self-hosted projects Dubois runs alongside his vault. Buying OSK gets zero autonomy infrastructure.
- Individual plugins Dubois sells alongside OSK (Ghost Publish, Typefully, Dataview Serializer, Kanban Action Planner) are independently free/MIT-licensed on his GitHub — only the OSK plugin itself (schema/note-type engine) is a private, paid-gated repo. → promoted as a general lesson (see below).
What came out of it (free, no purchase)
Section titled “What came out of it (free, no purchase)”Related-Tasks.base/Related-Notes.basebuilt atCore/Processes/Projects/KB-OS/Bases/— native Obsidian Bases implementing the “No Plugins, No AI” clipping’s two-tag discovery pattern, adapted to KB-OS’s actual task/note schema. Not yet visually verified in-app.- Kanban Action Planner (free, MIT license) — its WBS view renders parent/child hierarchy as a collapsible tree with rollups. Potentially closes the exact gap
ecco-replacement-research(2026-08-20) said no candidate had. Talbot approved install + test. - Dataview Serializer — candidate fix for
ecco-view.js’s render-only output being invisible to grep/AI. Talbot approved install + test (revertible). - Obsidian CLI (official, free) — flagged as the actual render-verification mechanism (its
eval/screenshot commands), since no generic desktop-control tool exists in a Claude Code session.
All follow-on execution (GUI installs + in-app verification, none of which a CLI-only session can do) spun out to Core/Processes/Projects/KB-OS/Tasks/Obsidian-Upgrades-Phase2-Verification.md.
Where findings live
Section titled “Where findings live”- Scored candidate table + status:
Core/Processes/Projects/KB-OS/UPGRADES.md→ “Obsidian Automation Guide — Upgrade Candidates” - Focus/Ecco-specific candidates:
Core/Processes/Projects/Focus/UPGRADES.md - ROADMAP milestone:
Core/Processes/Projects/KB-OS/ROADMAP.md→ M4.5
Lessons promoted
Section titled “Lessons promoted”- No desktop-control tool in Claude Code sessions; Obsidian CLI’s
eval/screenshot is the real render-verification path →KB-OS/LESSONS.md - Evaluating a paid bundle vs build-it-yourself: check each component at its own source (GitHub/repo), not the sales page →
ai-config/AGENTS.md(Hard Rules, after “CHECK RELEASE ASSETS, NOT WRITE-UPS”)